Web application pentest
Manual, exploit-driven testing against the OWASP Top 10 and beyond, not a scanner export.
An automated scanner returns three hundred findings and most of them are noise. We test manually, the way an attacker actually would: trying to chain a small access-control mistake into reading someone else's data, or an input field into a working exploit. You get a proven exploit chain with a fix for each real finding, and a retest once it is patched, not a PDF full of false positives.
How it runs
- 1
Map the real attack surface
Every endpoint, form, role and integration is catalogued before any exploit attempt, so nothing is tested blind.
- 2
Test manually, chain where possible
A small misconfiguration on its own may look minor; we test whether it chains into something serious, the way a real attacker would.
- 3
Prove it, do not just claim it
Every finding ships with a working proof of concept: the request, the response, and what it actually exposes.
- 4
Retest after the fix
Once a fix is deployed, we retest that specific finding to confirm it is genuinely closed, not just hidden.
Common questions
How is this different from running a vulnerability scanner ourselves?
Will testing break our production site?
What happens after you find something critical?
Tell us what you need.
One paragraph is enough. You'll get a straight answer on whether it's a fit, roughly what it takes, and what happens next.